| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints |
| Date: | 2021-09-13 16:14:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZNqj7ksvnSsFYvYZ4TH+ESAQQ0sJOtQavkzcT6aFHuGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 12:17 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree with you, even though I think that scanning pg_class for identifying the relfilenode looks like a more sensible thing to do than directly scanning the file system, we need to consider one point that, now also in current system (in create database) we are scanning the directory for copying the file so instead of copying them directly we need to logically identify the relfilenode and then copy it block by block, so maybe this approach will not make anyone unhappy because it is not any worse than the current system.
So, I agree. If we can't get agreement on this approach, then we can
do that, and as you say, it's no worse than what we are doing now. But
I am just trying to lay out my view of why I think that's not as good
as this.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-09-13 16:15:24 | Re: What are exactly bootstrap processes, auxiliary processes, standalone backends, normal backends(user sessions)? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2021-09-13 16:12:40 | Re: refactoring basebackup.c |