| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2019-03-14 16:01:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYi+vOokjC_92vUdA7uVKULLcHgZY_2b_uz-HyjsudYWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:12 AM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 10:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Would anyone like to argue that there is any other reason not to
> > commit these patches?
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to
> dedicate some time to look at it.
>
> It looks like you've pushed all of this now. Can the CF entry be
> marked as committed?
Yeah, done now, thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-14 16:02:10 | Re: why doesn't DestroyPartitionDirectory hash_destroy? |
| Previous Message | Michael Banck | 2019-03-14 15:54:34 | Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums |