Re: CustomScan under the Gather node?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CustomScan under the Gather node?
Date: 2016-01-28 16:28:19
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYKVGdnLtArk=hHEnOr3-DUQD=qn6jSROjvkuGNXo4ZDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>> If I would make a proof-of-concept patch with interface itself, it
>> seems to me file_fdw may be a good candidate for this enhancement.
>> It is not a field for postgres_fdw.
>>
> The attached patch is enhancement of FDW/CSP interface and PoC feature
> of file_fdw to scan source file partially. It was smaller enhancement
> than my expectations.
>
> It works as follows. This query tried to read 20M rows from a CSV file,
> using 3 background worker processes.
>
> postgres=# set max_parallel_degree = 3;
> SET
> postgres=# explain analyze select * from test_csv where id % 20 = 6;
> QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gather (cost=1000.00..194108.60 rows=94056 width=52)
> (actual time=0.570..19268.010 rows=2000000 loops=1)
> Number of Workers: 3
> -> Parallel Foreign Scan on test_csv (cost=0.00..183703.00 rows=94056 width=52)
> (actual time=0.180..12744.655 rows=500000 loops=4)
> Filter: ((id % 20) = 6)
> Rows Removed by Filter: 9500000
> Foreign File: /tmp/testdata.csv
> Foreign File Size: 1504892535
> Planning time: 0.147 ms
> Execution time: 19330.201 ms
> (9 rows)

Could you try it not in parallel and then with 1, 2, 3, and 4 workers
and post the times for all?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-28 16:31:28 Re: Template for commit messages
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-01-28 16:26:56 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)