Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup
Date: 2024-01-09 18:18:51
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYAwqmj+xyFc1R5XsB62iR2zDiYckr8Hf2f8biJ7k1sEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello again,

I have now committed 0001.

I got some off-list review of 0004; specifically, Michael Paquier said
it looked OK, and Tom Lane found another bug. So I've added a fix for
that in what's now 0003.

Here's v2. I plan to commit the rest of this fairly soon if there are
no comments.

...Robert

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0002-Add-new-pg_walsummary-tool.patch application/octet-stream 21.9 KB
v2-0003-Repair-various-defects-in-dc212340058b4e7ecfc5a7a.patch application/octet-stream 6.3 KB
v2-0001-Add-new-function-pg_get_wal_summarizer_state.patch application/octet-stream 8.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2024-01-09 18:31:30 Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
Previous Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2024-01-09 17:59:34 Re: Add BF member koel-like indentation checks to SanityCheck CI