Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name

From: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date: 2023-07-04 14:40:14
Message-ID: CA+RLCQx2nDPtMqrC7MbmCCRBwncFrqnaxtz7SvqSAB3WhQuKuw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan,

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 8:12 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> > Great, thank you! The reason I was leaving the other constant in place to
> > make upgrading extensions trivial (so that they don't need to adjust for
> > this), but if you think this is a better way, I am fine with it.
>
> Sorry, I'm not following. Which constant are you referring to?
>

Apologies, I misread the final patch. All good!

--
Y.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2023-07-04 15:05:45 Re: Why is DATESTYLE, ordering ignored for output but used for input ?
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2023-07-04 14:18:24 Re: ResourceOwner refactoring