Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Yurii Rashkovskii <yrashk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name
Date: 2023-07-04 03:12:26
Message-ID: 20230704031226.GA3372172@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 06:00:12PM -0700, Yurii Rashkovskii wrote:
> Great, thank you! The reason I was leaving the other constant in place to
> make upgrading extensions trivial (so that they don't need to adjust for
> this), but if you think this is a better way, I am fine with it.

Sorry, I'm not following. Which constant are you referring to?

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-07-04 04:22:40 Re: DSA failed to allocate memory
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-07-04 02:29:24 Re: Is a pg_stat_force_next_flush() call sufficient for regression tests?