Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression

From: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
Date: 2020-02-19 06:56:45
Message-ID: CA+HiwqHuEmzTnYZaJp8D14VCc127dnAKdAWZoV-b6U7oO_oOJg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 3:38 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> st 19. 2. 2020 v 7:30 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:
>> út 18. 2. 2020 v 17:08 odesílatel Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> napsal:
>>> > I updated the patch to do that.
>>> >
>>> > With the new patch, `select foo()`, with inline-able sql_incr() in it,
>>> > runs in 679 ms.
>>> >
>>> > Without any inline-able function, it runs in 330 ms, whereas with
>>> > HEAD, it takes 590 ms.
>>>
>>> I polished it a bit.
>>
>>
>> the performance looks very interesting - on my comp the execution time of 100000000 iterations was decreased from 34 sec to 15 sec,
>>
>> So it is interesting speedup
>
> but regress tests fails

Oops, I failed to check src/pl/plpgsql tests.

Fixed in the attached.

Thanks,
Amit

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql-simple-exprs_v4.patch text/plain 12.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-02-19 07:00:49 Re: Yet another fast GiST build
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-02-19 06:37:26 Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression