| From: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: adding partitioned tables to publications |
| Date: | 2020-04-06 15:04:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+HiwqFA6V1QKLnHjyrVUBiDF4+K0U8MvymWWgkv4uWgeUfQrQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:25 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2020-04-03 16:25, Amit Langote wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:34 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> I am checking test coverage at the moment and should have the patches
> >> ready by sometime later today.
> >
> > Attached updated patches.
>
> Committed 0001 now. I'll work on the rest tomorrow.
Thank you. I have rebased the one remaining.
--
Thank you,
Amit Langote
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v17-0001-Allow-publishing-partition-changes-via-ancestors.patch | application/octet-stream | 58.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-06 15:13:24 | Re: where should I stick that backup? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-04-06 15:01:30 | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |