Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for DSM registry ?

From: Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: like pg_shmem_allocations, but fine-grained for DSM registry ?
Date: 2025-06-04 08:17:42
Message-ID: CA+v5N43GapjYRxZz_ckpn4tktiFH4hUaAuHF=V-37=vnMfcV6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 11:23 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> This latest patch set looks pretty good to me.
>

Thanks; let's wait a bit to see if there're any objections.
If not, I've taken note of

> created_at might be interesting.

For a separate patch .

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-06-04 09:09:45 Re: Enhance pg_createsubscriber to create required standby.
Previous Message Shinya Kato 2025-06-04 08:13:34 Re: Add log_autovacuum_{vacuum|analyze}_min_duration