Re: ERROR: unrecognized parameter "autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor"

From: Mariel Cherkassky <mariel(dot)cherkassky(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ERROR: unrecognized parameter "autovacuum_analyze_scale_factor"
Date: 2019-02-15 18:00:24
Message-ID: CA+t6e1=t7b-+E=GSUxQa-SVHmLUf8we0QTR6Gd0=rRkV6xaFSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

'but then I don't have accurate statistics on my toasted table..

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019, 3:39 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
wrote:

> On 2019-Feb-14, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
>
> > I meant the anaylze, if anaylze will run very often on the original
> table,
> > arent there disadvantages for it ?
>
> It'll waste time and resources pointlessly. Don't do it -- it won't do
> any good.
>
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-02-16 22:04:06 Re: constraint exclusion with ineq condition (Re: server hardware tuning.)
Previous Message Benedict Holland 2019-02-15 17:24:18 Re: constraint exclusion with ineq condition (Re: server hardware tuning.)