Re: range_agg

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2019-07-05 17:00:15
Message-ID: CA+renyXxNMmU=0Fj-ruGZfcAAvF1QUTY5reuz4C8XiACfNSQyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 11:34 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that this patch has a // comment about it segfaulting. Did
> you ever figure that out? Is the resulting code the one you intend as
> final?

Thanks for the review! I haven't revisited it but I'll see if I can
track it down. I consider this a WIP patch, not something final. (I
don't think Postgres likes C++-style comments, so anything that is //
marks something I consider needs more work.)

> Stylistically, the code does not match pgindent's choices very closely.
> I can return a diff to a pgindented version of your v0002 for your
> perusal, if it would be useful for you to learn its style.

Sorry about that, and thank you for making it easier for me to learn
how to do it the right way. :-)

Paul

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-07-05 17:06:20 Re: mcvstats serialization code is still shy of a load
Previous Message Noah Misch 2019-07-05 16:58:30 Re: Fix runtime errors from -fsanitize=undefined