Re: range_agg

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2020-01-19 23:34:25
Message-ID: CA+renyWzGGq38iv_hD4OE7AfHbxLJOtHAMtit=axJw6QdjdVQg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 12:10 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Now, I think so name "anymultirange" is not good. Maybe better name is just "multirange"

Are you sure? This function exists to be a cast to an anymultirange,
and I thought the convention was to name cast functions after their
destination type. I can change it, but in my opinion anymultirange
follows the Postgres conventions better. But just let me know and I'll
do "multirange" instead!

Yours,
Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-20 00:22:48 Re: [PATCH] src\backend\utils\adt\numeric.c copy and past error
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2020-01-19 23:11:56 [PATCH] src\backend\utils\adt\numeric.c copy and past error