| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Document the privileges FOR PORTION OF needs on the range column |
| Date: | 2026-09-04 21:03:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyVoGLOGTrWbWGPoYmCUsScxawMP+nEMm=deUA2KtVpPpQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Hackers,
Here is a fix for finding D13 from [0].
This is a doc-only change. Since UPDATE/DELETE FOR PORTION OF needs
UPDATE and/or SELECT permission on the application-time column, we
should document that.
Yours,
--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Document-the-privileges-FOR-PORTION-OF-needs-on-t.patch | text/x-patch | 2.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2026-09-04 21:04:29 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) doesn't check the table AM |
| Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-09-04 21:01:38 | Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) fails when table owner lacks CONNECT |