| From: | Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: range_agg |
| Date: | 2020-03-13 16:33:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+renyV_M=HJSWEaHmGEkw6xesVvxBXABzpCu3HXdC5K-yNcJA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:39 PM Paul A Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2020 at 12:20 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > [ v11 patches ]
> > The cfbot isn't too happy with this; it's getting differently-ordered
> > results than you apparently did for the list of owned objects in
> > dependency.out's DROP OWNED BY test. Not sure why that should be ---
> > it seems like af6550d34 should have ensured that there's only one
> > possible ordering.
>
> Oh, my last email left out the most important part. :-) Is this
> failure online somewhere so I can take a look at it and fix it?
Looks like I sent this just to Tom before. This is something I need to
fix, right?
Regards,
Paul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-03-13 16:54:18 | Re: backup manifests |
| Previous Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2020-03-13 16:32:20 | Re: range_agg |