Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)protonmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 PERIODS vs Postgres Ranges?
Date: 2021-04-08 23:40:51
Message-ID: CA+renyUuzamgeKgchi0-jnxFKaLdkT-81x3YA2rYZord0emybw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:22 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> Paul, you can submit to the next CF when you are ready with a new patch.

Thanks David! I've made a lot of progress but still need to finish
support for CASCADE on temporal foreign keys. I've been swamped with
other things, but hopefully I can get something during this current
CF.

Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Lee 2021-04-09 00:14:16 Postgresql 13 supported on Solaris 11 O/S on SPARC hardware?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-08 23:39:46 Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)