Re: range_agg

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2020-03-19 20:43:48
Message-ID: CA+renyUfQc6XHM8+Qk+XiE0z143PKamXt9f5twR5vqT2n0v45A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:42 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2020-Mar-16, Paul A Jungwirth wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:13 AM Paul A Jungwirth
> > <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
> > > I think that should fix the cfbot failure.
> >
> > I saw this patch was failing to apply again. There was some
> > refactoring to how polymorphic types are determined. I added my
> > changes for anymultirange to that new approach, and things should be
> > passing again.
>
> There's been another flurry of commits in the polymorphic types area.
> Can you please rebase again?

I noticed that too. :-) I'm about halfway through a rebase right now.
I can probably finish it up tonight.

Paul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2020-03-19 20:57:44 Re: Auxiliary Processes and MyAuxProc
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-19 20:41:56 Re: range_agg