Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS PKs used for functional grouping

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS PKs used for functional grouping
Date: 2026-10-13 00:28:05
Message-ID: CA+renyUJXw9-68kG6z1dx0yGpp9JbycYyJfh9Os5+iRmDhY-_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 9, 2026 at 5:10 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Without commenting about anything else, can you please not start separate
> threads for all these? Hackers is too busy to be able to keep up with
> everything, no need to make it even worse.

I apologize. I'm happy to do whatever makes things easier for you. I'm
a little surprised by your request though. The six bugs you reported
don't have much in common. (I did merge the two replication bugs
though, since they had the same underlying cause.) Earlier in this
cycle we had one FOR PORTION OF thread with several concurrent patches
being discussed, and it was very confusing. And one of the new threads
already has eleven messages.[0] Anyway I think it is too late to smash
them all together again, but if I get another batch of bugs I'll check
first before I separate them.

[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BrenyWzTBC4GetPzJM1KqrejrmOWcGnn2NaA7tpee17HFxRPw%40mail.gmail.com

Yours,

--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-10-13 00:32:52 Re: Deprecation warnings on Rocky 10.2 with current dev branch
Previous Message Paul A Jungwirth 2026-10-13 00:07:29 Re: Fix WITHOUT OVERLAPS multirange with location replication