Re: FOR PORTION OF code review

From: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FOR PORTION OF code review
Date: 2026-09-11 15:52:06
Message-ID: CA+renyUDPDJ9gRZxcuOV7HLE1JTS+4EcAhWrih3p-hHpODHjvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 6:10 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> [RMT hat]
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 08:50:07AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> > [detailed review]
>
> Thanks for doing this, Andres. Peter/Paul, can you please respond with
> your thoughts?

Hi Andres, thank you for taking the time to give such a thorough
review. I've gone through everything in your first email and should
have some patches and item-by-item feedback this morning. I've also
read through your second list; I'll work on that after addressing the
first items.

Yours,

--
Paul ~{:-)
pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2026-09-11 15:58:31 Re: pg_get_*_ddl() needs a redesign
Previous Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-09-11 15:44:26 Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values, round two