| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |
| Date: | 2019-05-20 19:22:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcXcfcxU3QXXvT0b+fKRk507HJi-s1EhmyJBq8LFsjr-KA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:20 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On May 20, 2019 12:14:30 PM PDT, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 8:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes. Thanks for the comment!
> >> Attached is the updated version of the patch.
> >> It adds such common rule.
> >
> >If I understand correctly, it resulted in the commit fc7c281f8. For
> >some reason
> >it breaks vacuum tests for me, is it expected?
> >
> > ANALYZE (nonexistent-arg) does_not_exist;
> > -ERROR: syntax error at or near "-"
> > +ERROR: syntax error at or near "arg"
> > LINE 1: ANALYZE (nonexistent-arg) does_not_exist;
> > - ^
> > + ^
> > ANALYZE (nonexistentarg) does_not_exit;
>
> That has since been fixed, right?
Yep, right, after I've checkout 47a14c99e471. Sorry for the noise.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-05-20 20:08:42 | Re: Question about new pg12 feature no-rewrite timestamp to timestamptz conversion |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2019-05-20 19:20:35 | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |