| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). |
| Date: | 2018-02-18 17:49:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcXLYS4yKRa1n79ORqPUfLJb0mVyJXRfHDcbGZ44o8hCCw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 17 February 2018 at 10:02, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
>
> I think it could be fixed by another patch. But I'm not sure that it
> will be accepted as well as this patch :).
Why do you think there should be another patch for it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2018-02-18 18:33:23 | Re: missing toast table for pg_policy |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-02-18 16:51:56 | Re: different results from plpgsql functions related to last changes in master |