Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample values for pg_stat_statements
Date: 2018-11-29 15:58:05
Message-ID: CA+q6zcWbLBKGes5icRbS6J0jYih1h8tzpzJsnpF2Bxq=9d6W5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:30 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:58:44PM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote:
> > I think I handle that well enough with permission checking, but I'm open
> > to more debate on it.
>
> The recent version bump in pg_stat_statements (Sorry my fault!) is
> causing this patch to not apply anymore. I have moved it to next CF
> with waiting on author as status.

Unfortunately, the patch is still needs to be rebased.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-29 16:14:57 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-29 15:54:14 Re: Implementing SQL ASSERTION