Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Progress reporting for pg_verify_checksums
Date: 2018-11-29 19:01:52
Message-ID: CA+q6zcWWpXTnOY8c5W2SRs_7pvqtKsKs1+MvwdR=MxpHF0VS-g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:51 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:07 AM Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de> wrote:
> > I've attached v4 of the patch.
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Windows doesn't like sigaction:
>
> https://ci.appveyor.com/project/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/build/1.0.15189
>
> I'm not sure if we classify this as a "frontend" program. Should it
> be using pqsignal() from src/port/pqsignal.c? Or perhaps just
> sigaction as you have it (pqsignal.c says that we require sigaction on
> all Unices), but #ifndef WIN32 around that stuff, since SIGUSR1 is
> never going to work anyway.

Unfortunately, patch also has some conflicts with the current master. I'll move
it to the next CF.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-11-29 19:11:09 Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears
Previous Message Alexander Kuzmenkov 2018-11-29 18:29:15 Re: "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" is not quite as silly as it appears