| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com, i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru |
| Subject: | Re: Changing the autovacuum launcher scheduling; oldest table first algorithm |
| Date: | 2018-11-29 17:21:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcVzA5jOJi6bva-vL36KRq_7O0L7NhFwktZBrvLuyEK+Dw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:42 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:20:53PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > If there is an up-to-date information meaning either that there is no
> > tables needing vacuum or that there is only table needing vacuum but
> > being vacuumed by other worker, AV launcher can launches new one to
> > other database.
>
> I am not completely sure what we want to do with this patch in
> particular as there are many approaches and things which can be
> discussed. For now, the latest patch proposed does not apply, so I am
> moving it to next CF, waiting for its author.
Nothing changed since then, but also the patch got not enough review to say
that there was substantial feedback. I'll move it to the next CF.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-11-29 17:35:15 | Re: New GUC to sample log queries |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-29 17:15:08 | Removing remaining parallel-build hazards in ecpg |