Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
Date: 2018-11-29 16:18:34
Message-ID: CA+q6zcVukPgSs_=DoE1VKuHWAjHY+e9kc=27DnxU05C8soVdwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 8:54 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 07:03:47PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > I think Robert's chash stuff [1] might be helpful to reduce the contention
> > you are seeing.
>
> Latest patch available does not apply, so I moved it to next CF. The
> thread has died a bit as well...

Unfortunately, patch is still needs to be rebased. Could you do this, are there
any plans about the patch?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-29 16:23:11 Re: hostorder and failover_timeout for libpq
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2018-11-29 16:14:57 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq