Re: Index Skip Scan

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <a(dot)kuzmenkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bhushan Uparkar <bhushan(dot)uparkar(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan
Date: 2019-05-11 16:35:41
Message-ID: CA+q6zcVQG0ufA_5m_7eeHLN2VRy+z8Kf9FoZ2NnF=yd0_43ndg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:01 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Rebase after refactoring of nbtree insertion scankeys. But so far it's purely
> mechanical, just to make it work - I guess I'll need to try to rewrite some
> parts of the patch, that don't look natural now, accordingly.

Here is the updated version with the changes I was talking about (mostly about
readability and code cleanup). I've also added few tests for a cursor behaviour.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v15-0001-Index-skip-scan.patch application/octet-stream 40.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-05-11 17:28:08 Re: pg12 release notes
Previous Message Bhuvan Singla 2019-05-11 14:52:22 Hello