| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take |
| Date: | 2018-12-11 09:37:28 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcUq+T8yaA9tD+2LeSuu0q==7U0Ossp4bg0D0UDRbPmHZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 3:13 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-11-26 17:55:57 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> > FWIW, now that oids are removed, and the tuple table slot abstraction
> > got in, I'm working on rebasing the pluggable storage patchset ontop of
> > that.
>
> I've pushed a version to that to the git tree, including a rebased
> version of zheap:
> https://github.com/anarazel/postgres-pluggable-storage
> https://github.com/anarazel/postgres-pluggable-zheap
Great, thanks!
As a side note, I assume the last reference should be this, right?
https://github.com/anarazel/postgres-pluggable-storage/tree/pluggable-zheap
> Further tasks I'm not yet planning to tackle, that I'd welcome help on:
> - pg_dump support
> - pg_upgrade testing
> - I think we should consider removing HeapTuple->t_tableOid, it should
> imo live entirely in the slot
I would love to try help with pg_dump support.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2018-12-11 10:13:44 | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |
| Previous Message | Sergei Kornilov | 2018-12-11 08:59:08 | Re: allow online change primary_conninfo |