> On 27 January 2018 at 16:03, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Aren't those numbers far lower that you'd expect from NVMe storage? I do
> have a NVMe drive (Intel 750) in my machine, and I can do thousands of
> transactions on it with two clients. Seems a bit suspicious.
Maybe an NVMe storage can provide much higher numbers in general, but there are
resource limitations from AWS itself. I was using c5.large, which is the
smallest possible instance of type c5, so maybe that can explain absolute
numbers - but anyway I can recheck, just in case if I missed something.