| From: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Date: | 2017-09-18 08:31:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+q6zcUVWwRXNWa5YUtEdYjhEf59-qKfm3tsw3jK6JTW6xS13w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 17 September 2017 at 23:34, Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
wrote:
>
> I have put some thought into it. What about the following syntax?
>
> CREATE SUBSCRIPTING FOR type_name
> INITFUNC = subscripting_init_func
> FETCHFUNC = subscripting_fetch_func
> ASSIGNFUNC = subscripting_assign_func
> DROP SUBSCRIPTING FOR type_name
Just to clarify, do you mean that `CREATE SUBSCRIPTING FOR` would only make
a
dependency record? In this case `DROP SUBSCRIPTING FOR` actually means just
drop an init function.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-09-18 08:52:44 | Reporting query on crash even if completed |
| Previous Message | Adrien Nayrat | 2017-09-18 08:14:39 | Re: Improving DISTINCT with LooseScan node |