| From: | Torello Querci <tquerci(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem creating index |
| Date: | 2013-08-26 16:16:45 |
| Message-ID: | CA+igE6QmRD3osKc8shuaPkD2UVXmtb1NQkGqQGWkjd-RCKFGPg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/8/26 Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Torello Querci <tquerci(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > ERROR: unexpected end of tape
>
> Really strange, if I get it right something went wrong while sorting
> tuples.
> Is it possible to test with an incremented work_mem value?
>
> Actually I use the default work_set value (1MB).
Of course it is possible increase work_set value to any values.
Now I'll try with 10MB (shared_buffers is set to 412MB).
If you think that 10MB is a very low value for a table with million of
records I can try to increase work_set value to higher value.
Best Regards, Torello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-08-26 16:19:40 | Re: What is the relationship between checkpoint and wal |
| Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2013-08-26 16:04:06 | Re: Problem creating index |