gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only
Date: 2019-08-27 00:51:43
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLukanJE9W8C+0n8iRsZDpbuhcWOxBMjGaUO-RNHhBGXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

This is apparently an EDB-owned machine but I have no access to it
currently (I could ask if necessary). For some reason it's been
failing for a week, but only on REL_12_STABLE, with this in the log:

2019-08-20 04:31:48.886 MDT [13421:4] LOG: server process (PID 13871)
was terminated by signal 11: unrecognized signal
2019-08-20 04:31:48.886 MDT [13421:5] DETAIL: Failed process was
running: SET default_table_access_method = '';

Apparently HPUX's sys_siglist doesn't recognise that most popular of
signals, 11, but by googling I see that it has its traditional meaning
there. That's clearly in the create_am test:

019-08-20 04:31:22.404 MDT [13871:31] pg_regress/create_am HINT: Use
DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too.
2019-08-20 04:31:22.404 MDT [13871:32] pg_regress/create_am STATEMENT:
DROP ACCESS METHOD gist2;
2019-08-20 04:31:22.405 MDT [13871:33] pg_regress/create_am LOG:
statement: DROP ACCESS METHOD gist2 CASCADE;
2019-08-20 04:31:22.422 MDT [13871:34] pg_regress/create_am LOG:
statement: SET default_table_access_method = '';

Perhaps it was really running the next statement.

It's hard to see how cdc8d371e2, the only non-doc commit listed on the
first failure, could have anything to do with that.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-08-27 01:48:01 Re: gharial segfaulting on REL_12_STABLE only
Previous Message Amit Langote 2019-08-27 00:51:36 Re: A problem about partitionwise join