On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 7:14 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> The patch seems harmless enough to me, no objections to committing it.
Thanks!
> However, I'm worried that we'll soon break it again. The new rule is
> apparently "include libpq first", but we have no way of enforcing it.
Hmm, my meson-fu is weak, but there must surely be some way to declare
that you want libpq and have it automatically put things in the right
order, will look into that...