Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict handling for COPY FROM
Date: 2019-07-05 04:10:19
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLatHZfyQsFOXEPJR7X_DT3nko5XY7W2mxg1t9782mR=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:57 PM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In addition to the above change in the attached patch i also change
> the syntax to ERROR LIMIT because it is no longer only skip
> unique and exclusion constrain violation

Hi Surafel,

FYI copy.sgml has some DTD validity problems.

https://travis-ci.org/postgresql-cfbot/postgresql/builds/554350168

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-05 04:21:17 Re: [proposal] de-TOAST'ing using a iterator
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-07-05 03:30:54 Re: check_recovery_target_lsn() does a PG_CATCH without a throw