From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: wal_init_zero and wal_recycle |
Date: | 2020-05-27 23:43:45 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLZ0WPUZiD+2Yehxx_ToBqur2A4-md6GDZ80HJr9moWdw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 7:09 PM Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 04:27, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The group of wal_init_zero and wal_recycle is WAL_SETTINGS in guc.c,
>> but their descriptions are located in "19.6. Replication"/"19.6.1. Sending
>> Servers" section. This seems a documentation bug. They should be located
>> in "19.5. Write Ahead Log"/"19.5.1. Settings". Thought?
>
>
> +1
>
> Why are there two settings for the same thing (COW support)?
> Would we really want to allow setting one but not the other?
In the long discussion[1] we decided to invent GUCs that tell you
precisely what they do, rather than trying to have a mysterious "COW
filesystem mode", given the apparent lack of COW filesystem expertise
in the thread (for example: claims, theories and data about ZFS were
presented, but do they also apply to BTRFS, APFS, ReFS, ...? I dunno,
and no one showed up with more information on that.)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | p.luzanov | 2020-05-28 09:21:14 | Re: max_wal_size |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-27 21:54:45 | Re: max_wal_size |