| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs |
| Date: | 2019-11-28 03:01:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLVaXQX5eV+b2j=U-9GukjRK0-qxo5vgZZa7Yt7WX4_8g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 3:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:03:20AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Oops, right. So it should just be added to the if condition. Will do.
>
> It's been a couple of months and the discussion has stale. It seems
> also that the patch was waiting for an update. So I am marking it as
> RwF for now. Please feel free to update it if you feel that's not
> adapted.
Thanks. We decided to redesign a couple of aspects of the undo
storage and record layers that this patch was intended to demonstrate,
and work on that is underway. More on that soon.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-11-28 03:09:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2019-11-28 02:56:47 | Re: missing estimation for coalesce function |