| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Non-reproducible AIO failure |
| Date: | 2025-08-26 03:45:25 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLSNaMAgSBtjJiCnbyHBoH05Xb60jOOaXwsAQQqrYS=MA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 12:37 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm a bit confused by this focus on bitfields - both Alexander and Konstantin
> stated they could reproduce the issue without the bitfields.
Konstantin's message all seem to say it *did* fix it?
But I do apologise for working through the same theory and analysis as
Konstantin had already done earlier. I somehow had the impression
this topic was considered closed, and was reacting to Alexander's
latest email as if it was a new variant of the problem when I wrote
that. ETHREADTOOLONG.
> But we have observed the generated code being pretty grotty and it's caused
> more than enough confusion - so let's just replace them with plain uint8's and
> cast in switches.
+1
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexandra Wang | 2025-08-26 03:52:28 | Re: SQL:2023 JSON simplified accessor support |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2025-08-26 03:26:16 | Re: [PATCH] no table rewrite when set column type to constrained domain |