Re: stress test for parallel workers

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date: 2019-07-23 22:40:16
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLPaVKj9CXyWueq7Vt6yeS7_3VKRoMXVeWdYzScpjnD3Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:03 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > edata = <value optimized out>

> If you have that core, it might be interesting to go to frame 2 and
> print *edata or edata->saved_errno. ...

Rats. We already saw that it's optimised out so unless we can find
that somewhere else in a variable that's present in the core, we
probably can't find out what the operating system said. So my other
idea for getting this information next time is to try putting the
PostgreSQL logs somewhere that's more likely to be still working when
that thing fails.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Pryzby 2019-07-23 22:42:55 Re: stress test for parallel workers
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-07-23 22:32:50 Re: range_agg