Re: Parallel leader process info in EXPLAIN

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel leader process info in EXPLAIN
Date: 2020-03-17 00:19:23
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLL=jrw=0iJuT=8AKLTXSn2hFLSEghAX8WGF9yZDU-h0Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 2:39 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 1/26/20 7:03 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Fair point. I will look into that.
>
> Are you still planning on looking at this patch for PG13?
>
> Based on the current state (002 abandoned, 001 needs total rework) I'd
> say it should just be Returned with Feedback or Closed for now.

When you put it like that, yeah :-) I marked it returned with
feedback. Thanks Melanie and Rafia for the reviews so far, and I'll
be back with a new version for PG14.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nikita Glukhov 2020-03-17 00:55:06 Re: SQL/JSON: functions
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-03-17 00:14:36 Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations