Re: VM corruption on standby

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: VM corruption on standby
Date: 2025-08-20 00:11:06
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLKALrA9M8i_crMN-Ude7AeZd0awxqYOd3SXO0hDwo2vw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 11:59 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> they can't all be
> blocked in sig_wait() unless there is already a deadlock.

s/sig_wait()/sem_wait()/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2025-08-20 00:37:56 Re: A few patches to clarify snapshot management
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-08-19 23:59:42 Re: VM corruption on standby