Re: Tid scan improvements

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Date: 2019-07-01 11:29:18
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLJhn1rG6mdAMzv=FN3Rw6G2Ag3fuuUJ6vje1r=MzT3Ow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:25 PM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 3/26/19 8:11 AM, Edmund Horner wrote:
> > Should I set update CF app to a) set the target version to 13, and/or
> > move it to next commitfest?
>
> If you plan to continue working on it in this CF then you can just
> change the target to PG13. If you plan to take a break and pick up the
> work later then go ahead and push it to the next CF.

Hi Edmund,

The new CF is here. I'm going through poking threads for submissions
that don't apply, but it sounds like this needs more than a rebase?
Perhaps this belongs in the next CF?

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-07-01 11:31:07 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-07-01 11:23:34 Re: Converting NOT IN to anti-joins during planning