From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | silva(dot)rick(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Documentation Issue? |
Date: | 2020-07-16 02:17:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLF_99pGPn0hWKFtpmUH0QgZwFnjHBBhi1y8jsAs+Gq9A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:25 AM PG Doc comments form
<noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/tutorial-join.html
> Description:
>
> The documentation at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/tutorial-join.html
> shows this query:
>
> SELECT *
> FROM weather, cities
> WHERE city = name;
>
> And then presents the following query as "an alternate form" that is "not as
> commonly used as the one above":
>
> SELECT *
> FROM weather INNER JOIN cities ON (weather.city = cities.name);
>
> Isn't that backwards? Isn't the first query the old ANSI-89 syntax?
> Shouldn't we be using then newer "INNER JOIN" syntax?
+1
Would you like to review the patch proposed over here?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-07-16 16:24:57 | Re: Installation instructions vs binaries |
Previous Message | Michael Christofides | 2020-07-15 22:15:09 | Re: List of pages from versions 9, 10, and 11 that don't exist in "current" |