Re: should check interrupts in BuildRelationExtStatistics ?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should check interrupts in BuildRelationExtStatistics ?
Date: 2022-07-06 00:44:08
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLB=cNksokWCPDwscUud0sy_LZ02o750S5ZNr_ny-spfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:37 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> qsort_interruptible

+1

FWIW compute_scalar_stats() was already noted as hot and perhaps a
candidate for specialisation (with more study needed), but
qsort_interruptible() seems like a sane use of ~4KB of text to me.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2022-07-06 00:54:46 Re: automatically generating node support functions
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-07-06 00:43:19 Re: doc: Fix description of how the default user name is chosen