| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <tmunro(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ldap/t/001_auth.pl fails with openldap 2.5 |
| Date: | 2021-10-13 22:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGL5_6ksBmZ4ebvuAecCZDZCmj7YOb009F4EH_gPanXZQQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 12:39 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Seems we need to replace -h & -p with a -H ldap://server:port/ style URI? I
> think that's fine to do unconditionally, the -H schema is pretty old I think
> (I seem to recall using it in the mid 2000s, when I learned to not like ldap
> by experience).
+1
> The only reason I'm hesitating a bit is that f0e60ee4bc0, the commit adding
> the ldap test suite, used an ldap:// uri for the server, but then 27cd521e6e7
> (adding the ldapsearch) didn't use that for the ldapsearch? Thomas?
My mistake, I probably copied it from somewhere without reading the
deprecation notice in the man page. I found the discussion[1], which
says "These options have been deprecated since 2000, so you've had
literally 20 years to migrate away from them".
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-10-13 22:58:32 | Re: GIN pending list cleanup during autoanalyze blocks cleanup by VACUUM |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2021-10-13 22:26:48 | XTS cipher mode for cluster file encryption |