Re: Key management with tests

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Key management with tests
Date: 2021-01-10 05:04:12
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL21_sf1gj2oxqGMEMJHxybZ_9v+9auz0_VDaDsUJZ+NQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 3:45 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Does anyone know why the cfbot applied the patch listed second first
> here?
>
> http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_31_2925.log
>
> Specifically, it applied hex..key.diff.gz before hex.diff.gz. I assumed
> it would apply attachments in the order they appear in the email.

It sorts the filenames (in this case after decompressing step removes
the .gz endings). That works pretty well for the patches that "git
format-patch" spits out, but it's a bit hit and miss with cases like
yours.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2021-01-10 06:44:14 Re: Spurious "apparent wraparound" via SimpleLruTruncate() rounding
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-01-10 02:45:29 Re: Key management with tests