Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GNU/Hurd portability patches
Date: 2025-11-10 20:27:47
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL-cLL8krCkV_Y59OLUdtw_zQ3=Bdsxo0gJDX6kKcsdpg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 9:03 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Interesting. Perhaps a minimal program that installs a handler
> assert(signo < 32) for both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 might fail too, if

Or tighter: assert(signo == SIGUSR1 || signo == SIGUSR2).

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-11-10 20:35:09 Re: Support allocating memory for large strings
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-11-10 20:25:33 Re: Trying out <stdatomic.h>