Re: Consistently use palloc_object() and palloc_array()

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Consistently use palloc_object() and palloc_array()
Date: 2025-11-28 22:31:28
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL+hiMRrAOqop1wmfpqTLg3GdyAJmO6KH6Dz3FjQvGN+w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Nov 29, 2025 at 10:47 AM David Geier <geidav(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I intentionally tried to avoid any semantic changes but it's of course
> possible something slipped through by accident.

Do you expect the generated code to be identical? Is it?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-11-28 22:50:34 Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins?
Previous Message Viktor Holmberg 2025-11-28 22:02:30 Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3)