Re: [PATCH] Fix possible underflow in expression (maxoff - 1)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix possible underflow in expression (maxoff - 1)
Date: 2019-12-18 00:18:18
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKuBP_pCk6eR3XK2PgtGi5ozD9GFxwdf33Gn9+=X1ytvg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 8:21 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier_gyn(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >Where are you getting this stuff from? Are you using a static analysis tool?

> Yes,two static tools, but reviewed by me.

If you're working on/with static code analysis tools, I have some
requests :-) How could we automate the discovery of latch wait
programming mistakes?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-12-18 01:17:58 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2019-12-18 00:12:11 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module