Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rinat Shigapov <rinatshigapov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes
Date: 2023-02-07 21:44:36
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKsivovnNAYyzQ6abpgKh_1c=qScgwDPACHHdnMVDRD4w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 5:25 AM Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:01 AM Rinat Shigapov <rinatshigapov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thomas, thank you for the details!
> >
> > Have you kept the branch that you used to generate the patch? Which commit should the patch apply to?
>
> You can try something like
> git checkout 'master(at){2018-05-13 13:37:00}'
> to get a commit by date from rev-parse.

I don't have time to work on this currently but if Rinat or others
want to look into it... maybe I should rebase that experiment on top
of current master. Here's the branch:

https://github.com/macdice/postgres/tree/ssi-index-locking-refinements

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-07 21:51:08 Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes
Previous Message Peter J. Holzer 2023-02-07 21:42:30 Re: PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-07 21:51:08 Re: Too coarse predicate locks granularity for B+ tree indexes
Previous Message Kirk Wolak 2023-02-07 21:08:02 Re: possible proposal plpgsql GET DIAGNOSTICS oid = PG_ROUTINE_OID