Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Change ereport level for QueuePartitionConstraintValidation
Date: 2019-07-14 23:46:14
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKmQUa7a=HJde5Fr5DvM-8FiE+9xCDShNoQ8DyQLFH52A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 12:17 AM Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> wrote:
> This change is discussed as open item for pg12. Seems we have nor objections nor agreement. I attached updated version due merge conflict.
>
> > Per discussion started here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZWSLUjVcc9KBSVvbn%3DU5QRgW1O-MgUX0y5CnLZOA2qyQ%40mail.gmail.com

I took the liberty of setting this to "Ready for Committer" to see if
we can get a decision one way or another and clear both a Commitfest
item and a PG12 Open Item. No committer is signed up, but it looks
like Amit L wrote the messages in question, Robert committed them, and
David made arguments for AND against on the referenced thread, so I'm
CCing them, and retreating to a safe distance.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-15 00:58:42 Using unique btree indexes for pathkeys with one extra column
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-14 22:48:13 Re: Built-in connection pooler