| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Artur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting |
| Date: | 2019-07-08 04:45:22 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKj6sSu7+a_u4S7uHV_4aFiN5Es+mz1jn0nYFZErX71qA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 6:22 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >> Rebase after pg_indent. Besides, off the list there was a suggestion that this
> > > >> could be useful to accept more than one data type as a key for subscripting.
> > > >> E.g. for jsonb it probably makes sense to understand both a simple key name and
> > > >> jsonpath:
> >
> > And one more rebase.
>
> Oh, looks like I was just confused and it wasn't necessary - for some reason
> starting from v22 cfbot tries to apply v6 instead of the latest one.
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry about that. It looks like I broke the cfbot code that picks
which thread to pull patches from when there are several registered in
the CF app, the last time the HTML format changed. Now it's back to
picking whichever thread has the most recent message on it. Such are
the joys of web scraping (obviously we need better integration and
that will happen, I just haven't had time yet).
Anyway, I fixed that. But now you really do need to rebase :-)
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-07-08 04:55:43 | Re: Declared but no defined functions |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-07-08 04:22:16 | Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree |