| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
| Date: | 2021-12-09 21:35:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKQx4hoaoTPwJddCD51nMW0SGvYHhL=Shn_q=90m0sSKQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 8:38 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2021-12-09 08:12:14 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > > Does anyone want to object to the concept of the "pg_user_files"
> > > directory or the developer-only GUC "allow_relative_tablespaces"?
> > > There's room for discussion about names; maybe initdb shouldn't create
> > > the directory unless you ask it to, or something.
>
> Personally I'd rather put relative tablespaces into a dedicated directory or
> just into pg_tblspc, but without a symlink. Some tools need to understand
> tablespace layout etc, and having them in a directory that, by the name, will
> also contain other things seems likely to cause confusion.
Alright, let me try it that way... more soon.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-12-09 21:36:05 | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-12-09 21:12:50 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |